The goal of Digital Plan
constructability Review Process is to make sure that projects are biddable,
buildable, cost-effective, and easy to manage. By preventing work delays and rework
during construction, as well as lowering construction wastes, constructability
reviews assist to reduce project risk and final project cost.
In the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC)
business, Digital Plan constructability Review Process is encountering
obstacles. Problems such as change orders and rework emerge during construction
as a result of the fragmented design and construction process, resulting in
poor schedule and cost performance.
To increase project performance, the notion of
"constructability" has been introduced to optimize construction
knowledge and expertise during the design phase. Let’s discuss about the
features of Digital Plan constructability Review Process.
Features of Digital Plan constructability Review Process
The basic purpose of any Digital Plan
constructability Review Process is to record the possible advantages of
conducting reviews and to confirm their use. The use of case studies was judged
acceptable for this research endeavor in order to assess and show the possible
benefits of constructability reviews. Projects were chosen to encompass a wide
range of construction and design elements, as well as scope and price
Project type, density of adjacent
development, expected construction cost, project designer, highway district,
project manager, and project origination were all things to think about. It was
expected that the small number of case studies would yield insignificant
findings in terms of the influence of these criteria.
However, an assumption was made to
take into account a balanced distribution of projects with higher and lower
expected construction costs. The projected construction cost threshold of ten
million dollars was chosen based on the average expected construction cost for
all projects assessed.
Reviewer
This variable was taken into account
in order to ensure sufficient distribution among the many reviewers who
completed reviews. However, due to the small number of instances, any
substantial examination was impossible; hence this was just a minor factor in
the case selection process.
Case studies should be chosen from
projects that have recently passed the Digital Plan constructability Review
Process. The selection of these projects was thought to be acceptable
since the final design would have been finished and the project may have
started construction, allowing for an examination of potential change orders
and cost issues. This allowed for an exact estimate of the impact of each
review remark on the project's cost, as well as the identification of any
potential flaws in the completed evaluations.
To avoid a concentration of cases in
a single district, adequate coverage of cases across the state is desired. This
requirement was eased since, owing to the limited number of instances, all
districts would not be represented.
Previous studies has examined the structure of Digital Plan
constructability Review Process knowledge and concluded that the right amount of detail of
constructability input should be considered at the appropriate phase of
facility design. Knowledge-based systems and quantitative modelling are two
approaches that have been created for assessing and analyzing constructability.
Conclusion
However, due
to the limits of such technologies, the applicability for Digital Plan constructability Review Process has been limited. The current work offers a case study analyzing the
applicability of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Digital Plan
constructability Review Process, in light of the introduction of virtual prototyping in the AEC sector.
The method
for capturing design-related Digital Plan constructability Review
Process concerns using BIM information is
examined. The advantages of employing BIM as a shared knowledge resource to
enhance constructability assessment and decision-making processes prior to
construction are explored.
